Ethics in Digital Marketing. How does this apply for small businesses?

Internet 2.0 has brought about many interesting and helpful things to businesses. People have become more and more reliant on bigger companies like google or youtube.

However, this comes at a cost, the privacy of consumers. Up till now there is no rule about consumers and how they can protected. It’s still a very grey area even till now (year 2020). But certain things are made certain and if you’re not aware, your business might just end up breaking the law or even ethical standards of Singapore.

Singapore has 2 main guidelines to abide by when doing digital marketing where ethics are concerned.

  1. Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA)
  2. Singapore Code of Advertising Practice (SCAP)

So how does it apply to small businesses?

1. Truthful representation

As a business one code of ethics is truthful representation. Which means that advertisements should not mislead in any way by inaccuracy, ambiguity, exaggeration, omission or otherwise.

Small businesses should not lie about different claims or benefits if they are not true or factual. Businesses should also not lie about different facts about the product or prices in the business, it should not even mislead customers about the implied meaning of the advertisement.

Also an advertisement should be stated clearly as an advertisement.

2. Reviews that are disguised as being from impartial sources are not permitted

When using reviews to advertise for the company, it is illegal to use partial sources and disguise it as an impartial source. For example, there is a rise in fake reviewers who get paid to leave high reviews to boost the ranking of their products in places such as TaoBao. Even though positive reviews give a 9% increase in sales, however, it is illegal to do so according to SCAP.

3. The use of services and methods that fraudulently boost user engagement is prohibited

According to SCAP, using methods to boost user engagement is prohibited. So things like buying followers or bot followers to boost your likes or shares on a post so that the algorithm will boost your post is totally illegal. One example of this is when politicians from Indonesia, India and Thailand having fake Twitter followers, they do this to give their messaging a boost. But if put in a Singaporean context, this would be illegal.

4. Do not collect unnecessary data from consumers.

Today, vast amounts of personal data are collected, used and even transferred to third party organisations for a variety of reasons. This trend is expected to grow exponentially as the processing and analysis of large amounts of personal data becomes possible with increasingly sophisticated technology. With such a trend comes growing concerns from individuals about how their personal data is being used. Hence, a data protection regime to govern the collection, use and disclosure of personal data is necessary to address these concerns and to maintain individuals’ trust in organisations that manage data.

The PDPA is meant to protect consumers from organisations that would want to take their data to use it for their own personal gain. Like for example, companies selling customers information to an insurance company for telemarketing purpose.

Now if it’s found that a company violates the PDPA, the company will need to pay a fine of up to $10,000 SGD for every case.

What happens if you do decide to risk it and be unethical?

According to ASAS, marketers who fail to comply with the guidelines will be instructed to amend their marketing communication and failing to withdraw them altogether to avoid misleading consumers.

They will also risk the withholding of advertising space or time by media owners, as well as the withdrawal of trading privileges from advertising agencies.

Marketers who fail to comply with the guidelines will be instructed to amend their marketing communication, failing to do so will result in removal of the ads altogether.

In the case of bloggers, they risk the withholding of monies by their agencies. In extreme cases, there is the additional sanction of adverse publicity through the publication of details of the outcome of ASAS’ investigation.

Under certain circumstances, Consumers Association of Singapore (CASE) may also take further action under the Consumer Protection (Fair Trading) Act.

Conclusion

Don’t be unethical and although it’s hard to compete with larger companies with seemingly unending budgets, it is still very possible to be at the top of your marketing game so long as you are creative.

12 thoughts on “Ethics in Digital Marketing. How does this apply for small businesses?

  1. Hey Marvin! Thanks for the post! Very informative for people to take note about things like this. I liked how you mentioned about the example on Taobao. I’ve been seeing a lot of fake reviews and when I bought the things that they advertised it didn’t turn out the ways the reviews have been saying that it works so I really relate. Thanks for bringing up the issue on fake advertising.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Hello Marvin. I agree that people who are unethical should be punished and I’m glad that the government is taking active steps in preventing these in the future. I abhore telemarketers and I have applied for the DNC in Singapore to prevent myself from getting any of these calls in the future and I encourage you to do so as well. Good post!

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Wow! I didn’t know that it would be so serious if you violate PDPA, now I know why malls have stopped collecting my information for lucky draw prizes. I didn’t know it was an act of PDPA and that they would be punished I just thought someone complained about privacy! Thank you for your post! It was helpful in understanding what small businesses have to be aware of!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Hello Henry! Yes PDPA has serious consequences which are why even for all the companies I work for, they simply stopped collecting information or even if they do they have a waver for customers to sign beforehand!

      Like

  4. Hi Marvin, I would like to ask if leaving reviews as advertising is alright though. My company has been doing that with consent from their customers is that still violating SCAP?

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Unethical practices in this space is fairly common, especially with influencers who game the system by purchasing likes and followers, i believe more could be done in terms of regulations, its straight up fraud when these influencers do not deliver the reach and hit metrics as promised.

    Legality and CASE is one thing, but to put it in practice and enforcement is entirely different,

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Hi Fabian! Thank you for your comment! Yes! I think after the Covid situation tides over, legislation should focus on doing something about these fake accounts or remove inactive accounts to prevent scams!

      Like

  6. Thanks for the informative article! Definitely useful and applicable for everyone and not just small companies!

    Like

  7. Thank you Marvin for speaking out! Efficient markets are fair to all when decisions made are ethical indeed! With the current days of innovation, gig economy and entrepreneurship, many companies are growing in the own rights – hopefully by ethical means. And of course, it takes ethics to keep a market sustainable and competitive. Thanks for the article!

    Like

Leave a reply to marvinnys Cancel reply

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started